• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 10: Clinical Results
    • Comparison of UKA and TKA
    • Matched comparisons of UKA and TKA
    • Addressing the high revision rate
    • Results of Oxford UKA in registries
    • Non-registry studies
      • TOPKAT (Total Or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial)
      • Health economic studies
    • Cohort studies of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
      • Tables of results
      • Functional outcome
    • Studies of other UKA and comparison of OUKA and others
    • Clinical results of cementless Oxford UKA
    • Conclusions
    • References

References

15 views 0

Ackroyd CE, Whitehouse SL, Newman JH & Joslin CC. A comparative study of the medial St Georg sled and kinematic total knee arthroplasties. Ten-year survivorship. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002; 84(5): 667-72. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.84B5.0840667

Amin AK, Patton JT, Cook RE, Gaston M & Brenkel IJ. Unicompartmental or total knee arthroplasty?: Results from a matched study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006; 451: 101-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000224052.01873.20

Ansari S, Newman JH & Ackroyd CE. St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years. Acta Orthop Scand 1997; 68(5): 430-4. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679708996257

Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM & Parratte S. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2013; 95(10): 905-9. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00963

Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry, 2013.

Baker PN, Petheram T, Jameson SS, Avery PJ, Reed MR, Gregg PJ & Deehan DJ. Comparison of patient-reported outcome measures following total and unicondylar knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(7): 919-27. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B7.28436

Barrington JW & Emerson RH. The Oxford Knee: First report of 20-year follow-up in the US. AAOS. New Orleans; 2010. p. Paper no 422.

Berend ME, Nunley R, Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Della Valle CJ & Barrack RL. Patient satisfaction and residual pain following TKR, fixed bearing and mobile bearing PKR. Closed Meeting of the Knee Society, Charlotte, NC, USA, September 2014.

Beard D, Price A, Cook J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A, Campbell M, Doll H, Campbell H, Arden N, Cooper C, Davies L & Murray D. Total or Partial Knee Arthroplasty Trial – TOPKAT: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14: 292. https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-14-292

Beard D, Price A, Cook J, Maclennan G, Campbell M, Davies L & Murray D, TOPKAT Study Group. Total or Partial Knee Replacement: One year results from a large multi-centre randomised controlled trial (TOPKAT). ESSKA, Geneva, Switzerland, June 2016.

Bottomley NJ, Jones L, Rout R, Jackson WF, Beard D & Price A. The survival and functional outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty undertaken by high or low volume users (poster #202). American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, USA, 2015.

Briant-Evans T, Gould A, Pearce A, Risebury M, Thomas N & Wilson A. The Oxford Phase 3 medial unicompartmental knee replacement. 10 year results from an independent centre: Survival, function and risk factors for revision. British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Annual Meeting. Derby, UK; 2013.

Cartier P, Sanouiller JL & Grelsamer RP. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty surgery. 10-year minimum follow-up period. J Arthroplasty 1996; 11(7): 782-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(96)80177-X

Choy WS, Kim KJ, Lee SK, Yang DS & Lee NK. Mid-term results of Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Surg 2011; 3(3): 178-83. https://doi.org/10.4055/cios.2011.3.3.178

Confalonieri N, Manzotti A & Pullen C. Navigated shorter incision or smaller implant in knee arthritis? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007; 463: 63-7. https://doi.org/10.1097/BLO.0b013e31811f3a30

Costa CR, Johnson AJ, Mont MA & Bonutti PM. Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. J Knee Surg 2011; 24(4): 273-8. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1280970

Dalury DF, Fisher DA, Adams MJ & Gonzales RA. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compares favorably to total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. Orthopedics 2009; 32(4). https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20090728-32

Danish Knee Arthroplasty Register – Annual Report 2010. Aarhus, Denmark, 2010.

Davidson JA, Jha S, Edmondson M, Sandiford N, Miles K, East D, Apthorp H, Goddard R & Butler-Manuel PA. The use of the Oxford Partial Knee Replacement in the elderly population; a knee for life? Oxford Global Masters Symposium. Oxford; 2012.

  • Esler C, Roberts V & Harper W. 15 year outcome of 4665 primary knee arthroplasties: Results from a UK joint register. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Annual Meeting, San Francisco, USA, 2008.

Faour-Martin O, Valverde-Garcia JA, Martin-Ferrero MA, Vega-Castrillo A, de la Red Gallego MA, Suarez de Puga CC & Amigo-Linares L. Oxford phase 3 unicondylar knee arthroplasty through a minimally invasive approach: long-term results. Int Orthop 2013; 37(5): 833-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1830-8

Foran JR, Brown NM, Della Valle CJ, Berger RA & Galante JO. Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2013; 471(1): 102-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-012-2517-y

Ghomrawi HM, Eggman AA & Pearle AD. Effect of age on cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty compared with total knee arthroplasty in the US. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2015; 97(5): 396-402. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00169

Goodfellow JW, O’Connor JJ & Murray DW. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(12): 1628-31. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B12.25193

Gulati A, Pandit H, Jenkins C, Chau R, Dodd CA & Murray DW. The effect of leg alignment on the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(4): 469-74. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B4.22105

Hall MJ, Connell DA & Morris HG. Medium to long-term results of the UNIX uncemented unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2013; 20(5): 328-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2012.09.010

Hamilton T, Pandit H & Murray D. Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: a meta-analysis. 2016; in preparation.

Heck DA, Marmor L, Gibson A & Rougraff BT. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A multicenter investigation with long-term follow-up evaluation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286): 154-9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199301000-00023

Heyse TJ, Khefacha A, Peersman G & Cartier P. Survivorship of UKA in the middle-aged. Knee 2012; 19(5): 585-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.09.002

Hunt LP, Ben-Shlomo Y, Clark EM, Dieppe P, Judge A, MacGregor AJ, Tobias JH, Vernon K & Blom AW, on behalf of the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 45-day mortality after 467 779 knee replacements for osteoarthritis from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales: an observational study. Lancet 2014; Oct 18; 384(9952):1429-36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60540-7

John J, Mauffrey C & May P. Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series. Int Orthop 2011; 35(4): 507-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-010-1006-8

Kalairajah Y, Azurza K, Hulme C, Molloy S & Drabu KJ. Health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasties–a comparison between the Harris hip score and the Oxford hip score. J Arthroplasty 2005; 20(8): 1037-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2005.04.017

Keblish PA & Briard JL. Mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 2-center study with an 11-year (mean) follow-up. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(7 Suppl 2): 87-94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2004.07.009

Kendrick BJ, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Jackson WF, Dodd CA, Price AJ &Murray DW. Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(2): 185-91. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331

Knee Roundup. The swings and roundabouts of unicompartmental arthroplasty. In Knee Roundup. Bone Joint J 360 2015; 4: 17.

Koskinen E, Paavolainen P, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P & Remes V. Unicondylar knee replacement for primary osteoarthritis: a prospective follow-up study of 1,819 patients from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2007; 78(1): 128-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670610013538

Koskinen E, Eskelinen A, Paavolainen P, Pulkkinen P & Remes V. Comparison of survival and cost-effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: a follow-up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(4): 499-507. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710015490

Kozinn SC & Scott R. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989; 71(1): 145-50. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-198971010-00023

Kumar A & Fiddian NJ. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty of the knee. Knee 1999; 6: 21-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(98)00006-4

Labek G, Sekyra K, Pawelka W, Janda W & Stockl B. Outcome and reproducibility of data concerning the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a structured literature review including arthroplasty registry data. Acta Orthop 2011; 82(2): 131-5. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2011.566134

Laurencin CT, Zelicof SB, Scott RD & Ewald FC. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273): 151-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199112000-00023

Lewold S, Goodman S, Knutson K, Robertsson O & Lidgren L. Oxford meniscal bearing knee versus the Marmor knee in unicompartmental arthroplasty for arthrosis. A Swedish multicenter survival study. J Arthroplasty 1995; 10(6): 722-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(05)80066-X

Liddle AD. Failure of unicompartmental knee replacement [DPhil]. Oxford: University of Oxford; 2014.

Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A & Murray DW. Narrow indications predict poor outcomes in unicompartmental knee replacement. International Society of Arthroplasty Registers (ISAR) Annual Meeting. Stratford-upon-Avon, UK; 2013.

Liddle AD, Pandit H, O’Brien S, Doran E, Penny ID, Hooper GJ, Burn PJ, Dodd CA, Beverland DE, Maxwell AR & Murray DW. Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees. Bone Joint J 2013; 95-B(2): 181-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B2.30411

Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H & Murray DW. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet 2014; 384(9952): 1437-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(14)60419-0

Liddle AD, Pandit H, Judge A & Murray DW. Patient reported outcomes following total and unicompartmental knee replacement: a study of 14,076 matched patients from the NJREW. Bone Joint J 2015 Jun; 97-B(6):793-80 https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B6.35155

Lim HC, Bae JH, Song SH & Kim SJ. Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement in Korean patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012; 94(8): 1071-6. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.94B8.29372

Lombardi AV, Jr., Berend KR, Walter CA, Aziz-Jacobo J & Cheney NA. Is recovery faster for mobile-bearing unicompartmental than total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009; 467(6): 1450-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0731-z

Marmor L. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Ten- to 13-year follow-up study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; (226): 14-20. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-198801000-00004

Murray DW, Goodfellow JW & O’Connor JJ. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1998; 80(6): 983-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.80B6.0800983

Nagy M & Keys GW. Long-term outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement in a district general hospital (paper 234). AAOS. Chicago; 2013.

Naudie D, Guerin J, Parker DA, Bourne RB & Rorabeck CH. Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with the Miller-Galante prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A(9): 1931-5. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200409000-00011

New Zealand Joint Registry 15 year Report. Christchurch, New Zealand, 2014.

Niinimaki TT, Murray DW, Partanen J, Pajala A & Leppilahti JI. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates. Knee 2011; 18(6): 432-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.08.004

NJR, 7th Annual Report, National Joint Registry for England and Wales. 2010.

O’Rourke MR, Gardner JJ, Callaghan JJ, Liu SS, Goetz DD, Vittetoe DA, Sullivan PM & Johnston RC. The John Insall Award: unicompartmental knee replacement: a minimum twenty-one-year follow up, end-result study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; 440: 27-37. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000185451.96987.aa

Pandit H, Gulati A, Jenkins C, Barker K, Price AJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW. Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment. Knee 2011; 18(3): 168-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2010.05.003

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA & Murray DW. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2011; 93(2): 198-204. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.93B2.25767

Pandit H, Hamilton TW, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW. The clinical outcome of minimally invasive Phase 3 Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a 15-year follow-up of 1000 UKAs. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(11): 1493-500. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B11.35634

Parratte S, Pauly V, Aubaniac JM & Argenson JN. No long-term difference between fixed and mobile medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012; 470(1): 61-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1961-4

Price AJ & Svard U. 20-year survival and 10-year clinical results of the Oxford medial UKA. 73rd Annual Meeting of the AAOS. Chicago, Il; 2006.

Price AJ & Svard U. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011; 469(1): 174-9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1506-2

Price AJ, Webb J, Topf H, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW & Murray DW, Oxford Hip and Knee Group. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty 2001; 16(8): 970-6. https://doi.org/10.1054/arth.2001.25552

Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UG & Murray DW. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005; 87(11): 1488-92. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16324

Price AJ, Waite JC, Svard U. Long-term clinical results of the medial Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005; (435):171-80. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200506000-00024

Rachha R, Veravalli K & Sood M. Medium term results of the Miller-Galante knee arthroplasty with 10 year survivorship. Acta Orthop Belg 2013; 79(2): 197-204.

Rajasekhar C, Das S & Smith A. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. 2- to 12-year results in a community hospital. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(7): 983-5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B7.15157

Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE, Davis KE, Meding JB & Berend ME. Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004; 86(1): 43-7. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.86B1.14244

Rothwell AG, Hooper GJ, Hobbs A & Frampton CM. An analysis of the Oxford hip and knee scores and their relationship to early joint revision in the New Zealand Joint Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010; 92(3): 413-8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.92B3.22913

Rougraff BT, Heck DA & Gibson AE. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1991; (273): 157-64. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199112000-00024

Shakespeare D & Jeffcote B. Unicondylar arthroplasty of the knee-cheap at half the price? Knee 2003; 10(4): 357-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00046-2

Slover J, Espehaug B, Havelin LI, Engesaeter LB, Furnes O, Tomek I & Tosteson A. Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty in elderly low-demand patients. A Markov decision analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(11): 2348-55. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.01033

Soohoo NF, Sharifi H, Kominski G & Lieberman JR. Cost-effectiveness analysis of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty as an alternative to total knee arthroplasty for unicompartmental osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006; 88(9): 1975-82. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-200609000-00011

Squire MW, Callaghan JJ, Goetz DD, Sullivan PM & Johnston RC. Unicompartmental knee replacement. A minimum 15 year followup study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367): 61-72. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199910000-00008

Steele RG, Hutabarat S, Evans RL, Ackroyd CE & Newman JH. Survivorship of the St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental knee replacement beyond ten years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006; 88(9): 1164-8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.88B9.18044

Stern SH, Becker MW & Insall JN. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1993; (286): 143-8. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199301000-00021

Sun PF & Jia YH. Mobile bearing UKA compared to fixed bearing TKA: a randomized prospective study. Knee 2012; 19(2): 103-6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.01.006

Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register, Annual Report. Helsingborg, Sweden, 2013.

Sweeney K, Grubisic M, Marra CA, Kendall R, Li LC & Lynd LD. Comparison of HRQL between unicompartmental knee arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty for the treatment of osteoarthritis. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(9 Suppl): 187-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.05.009

Svard U. Phase 1: Perhaps the gold standard for new technology and surgical technique. Global Oxford Masters Symposium. Keble College, Oxford: Biomet; 2012.

Tabor OB, Jr. & Tabor OB. Unicompartmental arthroplasty: a long-term follow-up study. J Arthroplasty 1998; 13(4): 373-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-5403(98)90001-8

Vorlat P, Verdonk R & Schauvlieghe H. The Oxford unicompartmental knee prosthesis: a 5-year follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2000; 8(3): 154-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050206

Wagner-Kristensen P. Follow up on 800 patients having a medial Oxford prosthesis at Vejle Hospital, Denmark. Oxford Global Masters Symposium. Oxford; 2012.

Walton NP, Jahromi I, Lewis PL, Dobson PJ, Angel KR & Campbell DG. Patient-perceived outcomes and return to sport and work: TKA versus mini-incision unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 2006; 19(2): 112-6. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1248089

Weale AE, Halabi OA, Jones PW & White SH. Perceptions of outcomes after unicompartmental and total knee replacements. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2001; (382): 143-53. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200101000-00021

Willis-Owen CA, Brust K, Alsop H, Miraldo M& Cobb JP. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee 2009; 16(6): 473-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2009.04.006

Yoshida K, Tada M, Yoshida H, Takei S, Fukuoka S & Nakamura H. Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in Japan – clinical results in greater than one thousand cases over ten years. J Arthroplasty 2013; 28(9 Suppl): 168-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.019

Xie F, Lo NN, Tarride JE, O’Reilly D, Goeree R & Lee HP. Total or partial knee replacement? Cost-utility analysis in patients with knee osteoarthritis based on a 2-year observational study. Eur J Health Econ 2010; 11(1): 27-34. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-009-0154-5

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Conclusions
  • Clinical results of cementless Oxford UKA
  • Studies of other UKA and comparison of OUKA and others
  • Functional outcome
  • Tables of results
  • Cohort studies of Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs