• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 4: Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Anteromedial osteoarthritis
      • Principal anatomical features
      • Progression to posteromedial osteoarthritis
    • How and why does the ACL rupture?
    • Preoperative assessment
    • Radiography
      • Technique
      • Lateral radiographs
      • Other radiographic observations
    • ACL damage
    • Summary of indications
    • Discussion of indications
      • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
      • Correctable varus deformity
    • References

Other radiographic observations

41 views 0

Osteophytes

Osteophytes are commonly seen at the margins of all the articular surfaces. Their presence around the lateral and patellofemoral surfaces does not necessarily indicate damage to the weight-bearing areas of these compartments. The presence of osteophytes at certain sites should be noted so that they can be removed at surgery.

On the lateral projection, there is often an osteophyte on the posterior margin of the medial tibial plateau which makes delivery of the plateau difficult (Fig. 4.12). Those on the back of the medial femoral condyle are sometimes large and may contribute to the flexion deformity by ‘tenting’ the posterior capsule. They can also impinge against the bearing in flexion and cause dislocation.

An osteophyte may be seen arising from the intercondylar region of the tibia, anterior to the attachment of the ACL. It can impinge against the femur in extension and constitute a block to the recovery of full extension. The osteophyte is typically ‘anvil’ shaped and is often seen on a lateral radiograph.

Figure 4.12 Radiograph of posterior tibial osteophyte.

Mediolateral subluxation

When there is significant loss of bone from the medial compartment (varus greater than 10°), the AP standing and the varus-stressed films may show lateral subluxation of the femur on the tibia (Fig. 4.13). If the valgus-stressed film shows complete reduction of the subluxation and the varus, both will be corrected by the operation and the subluxation can be ignored. If the subluxation persists on the valgus- stressed film, there is usually ACL deficiency and it is a contraindication to OUKA.

Figure 4.13 Varus stress radiograph (a) showing mediolateral subluxation which is corrected by valgus stress (b).

Intraoperative observations

The clinical and radiographic examinations described above can predict the suitability of a knee for OUKA with an accuracy of greater than 90%. However, the final decision, whether to proceed with unicompartmental or total replacement, is best taken on the operating table when the joint has been opened.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Correctable varus deformity
  • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
  • Discussion of indications
  • Summary of indications
  • ACL damage
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs