• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 4: Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Anteromedial osteoarthritis
      • Principal anatomical features
      • Progression to posteromedial osteoarthritis
    • How and why does the ACL rupture?
    • Preoperative assessment
    • Radiography
      • Technique
      • Lateral radiographs
      • Other radiographic observations
    • ACL damage
    • Summary of indications
    • Discussion of indications
      • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
      • Correctable varus deformity
    • References

Radiography

45 views 0

Radiography is the most useful adjunct to physical signs in demonstrating the suitability of a knee for OUKA.

Anteroposterior radiographs

Anteroposterior radiographs, taken in the standard way with the patient weight-bearing on the extended leg, can demonstrate loss of articular cartilage medially by showing that the condyles articulate ‘bone-on-bone’ (Ahlback stage 2 or more) (Ahlback, 1968). However, in some cases in which there is full-thickness cartilage loss, this method fails to reveal it. A better projection for this purpose is a Rosenberg view with the patient standing with the knee 45° flexed, with the X-ray beam appropriately tilted, to be parallel to the tibial plateau. A varus-stressed film is more reliable than either of these methods (Fig. 4.7).

Figure 4.7 Varus stressed radiograph of anteromedial OA.

Valgus-stressed radiographs

Valgus-stressed radiographs are used to ensure that there is a normal thickness of articular cartilage in the lateral compartment and to demonstrate that the intra-articular varus deformity is correctable (i.e. the MCL is not shortened). We have found no other method of investigation to be so satisfactory in confirming these two key requirements for successful unicompartmental arthroplasty (Gibson & Goodfellow, 1986).

When the patient stands on a knee with a varus deformity, body weight tends to distract the lateral joint surfaces (Thomas et al., 1975; Dacre et al. 1991). Therefore, to measure the thickness of the lateral compartment cartilage, the lateral condyles must be firmly apposed to one another by applying a valgus force to the otherwise unloaded limb.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Correctable varus deformity
  • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
  • Discussion of indications
  • Summary of indications
  • ACL damage
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs