• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • UNICOMPARTMENTAL ARTHROPLASTY WITH THE OXFORD KNEE
    • Preface
  • 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Lateral arthroplasty
  • 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • 4: Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
        • 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
          • 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
            • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
              • 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
                • 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
                  • 10: Clinical Results
                    • 11: Management of Complications
                      • 12: The Lateral Side
                        • Appendix: Mathematical models of the knee

                          11: Management of Complications

                          178 views 0

                          Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Buy the book here.

                          This chapter is available from Goodfellow Publishers as a PDF.
                           

                          Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee. Buy the book here.

                          This chapter is available from Goodfellow Publishers as a PDF.

                          Introduction

                          In this chapter we describe the common modes of failure of the OUKA and suggest ways of dealing with them. We also discuss why they occur and how they can be prevented.

                          Complications occur more commonly in the hands of learners than in those of the experienced surgeons whose reports are published in the literature. As a result, the incidence of complications is lower in published cohort series compared to national registers

                          In Table 11.1 we show the incidence of the various different complications in two different series, the NJR and our own series out to 15 years.

                          Table 11.1 Reasons for reoperation in the designer series and NJR based on Patient Time Incident Rate (PTIR).

                          Indication for re-operation / revision

                          Designer Series: Phase 3, at mean 10 years

                          NJR Data: at 10 years

                          Progression of arthritis in the lateral compartment

                          2.4 %

                          2.6 %

                          Bearing dislocation

                          0.7 %

                          0.1 %

                          Unexplained pain

                          0.7 %

                          1.9 %

                          Infection

                          0.6 %

                          0.5 %

                          Aseptic loosening

                          0.2 %

                          3.6 %

                          Fracture

                          0.2 %

                          PFJ problem

                          Other

                          0.6 %

                          3.5 %

                          In the long term, the commonest cause of failure is progression of arthritis in the lateral compartment although the incidence is low. In the NJR, there is a much higher incidence of revision for pain or loosening than in the designer series. This is likely to be, at least in part, because of misinterpretation of tibial radiolucency. Inexperienced surgeons often consider the common stable radiolucency to be a source of pain or indicative of loosening when the evidence suggests it is not. The dislocation rate of 0.1% in the NJR is surprisingly low, perhaps because surgeons do not consider treatment of a dislocation to be a revision. There are no failures because of patellofemoral joint problems or wear in either series.

                          Next >>

                          Was this helpful?

                          Yes  No
                          Related Articles
                          • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
                          • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
                          • References
                          • Conclusion
                          • The patellofemoral joint
                          • Ligament mechanics
                          The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

                          © All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

                          .

                          Privacy Policy

                          Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs