• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • UNICOMPARTMENTAL ARTHROPLASTY WITH THE OXFORD KNEE
    • Preface
  • 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Lateral arthroplasty
  • 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • 4: Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
        • 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
          • 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
            • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
              • 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
                • 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
                  • 10: Clinical Results
                    • 11: Management of Complications
                      • 12: The Lateral Side
                        • Appendix: Mathematical models of the knee

                          Lateral arthroplasty

                          135 views 0

                          Initially the same components were used for both medial and lateral unicompartmental replacement. The results on the lateral side were, however, disappointing with a dislocation rate of about 10% (Gunther et al., 1996). The reason for the high dislocation rate was that the lateral collateral ligament is loose in flexion (Fig 1.10). In contrast, the medial collateral ligament is tight in all positions. Over the years, many improvements to the implants and the surgical technique for lateral arthroplasty have been introduced with a steady improvement in results. The current iteration (Fig. 1.11), which involves a convex domed tibial plateau and biconcave bearing implanted through a lateral parapatellar approach, has reduced the dislocation rate to a level that is acceptable although it is still higher than that achieved on the medial side and is therefore only appropriate for surgeons experienced with the Oxford Knee. Less experienced surgeons are advised to use fixed bearing UKA laterally. The surgical technique is very different from that used on the medial side. Because lateral unicompartmental replacement is less common than medial UKA, the domed lateral Oxford Knee is only performed by a limited number of surgeons. However, with further improvements, we expect the dislocation rate to decrease further and the use of the domed lateral to increase.

                          Figure 1.10 Distraction of the lateral compartment in normal flexed valgus-stressed knee. (Reproduced with permission and copyright © of the British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery [Tokuhara Y, Kadoya Y, Nakagawa S, Kobayashi S and Takaoka K. The flexion gap in normal knees. An MRI study. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 2004; 86-B: 1133–6].)

                           Figure 1.11 Diagram and photograph of the Oxford Domed Lateral Unicompartmental Knee, with spherical femoral and tibial convex components and a biconcave meniscal bearing.

                          Next>>

                          Was this helpful?

                          Yes  No
                          Related Articles
                          • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
                          • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
                          • References
                          • Conclusion
                          • The patellofemoral joint
                          • Ligament mechanics
                          The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

                          © All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

                          .

                          Privacy Policy

                          Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs