• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 4: Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Anteromedial osteoarthritis
      • Principal anatomical features
      • Progression to posteromedial osteoarthritis
    • How and why does the ACL rupture?
    • Preoperative assessment
    • Radiography
      • Technique
      • Lateral radiographs
      • Other radiographic observations
    • ACL damage
    • Summary of indications
    • Discussion of indications
      • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
      • Correctable varus deformity
    • References

Preoperative assessment

47 views 0

Preoperative assessment aims to determine, as precisely as possible, whether a particular knee has anteromedial OA.

Clinical examination

Pain

Pain is usually felt near the medial joint line but it may be anterior, posterior, and even on the lateral side of the knee. Its localisation is not a reliable sign. Pain is felt on standing and walking, but is usually absent while sitting (when the intact articular surfaces at the back of the medial compartment are in contact) and when lying down (when the damaged surfaces are unloaded).

Severity of pain, limitation of walking distance and compromised quality of life are the factors that decide the need for operation. The criteria are similar to those used to justify TKA.

Physical signs

The principal physical signs were briefly described in the previous section.

1. Varus deformity of the leg is best seen when the patient is standing. Varus is seldom less than 5° on presentation and rarely more than 15°. A ‘lateral thrust’ of the knee is often seen on walking and is not a contraindication.

As already noted, the intra-articular varus deformity corrects spontaneously when the patient is seated with the knee flexed to 90° (Figs. 4.3(c) and (d)), and it can be manually corrected, by applying a valgus force, with the knee flexed 20° or more to relax the posterior capsule (Figs. 4.3(e) and (f)).

Figure 4.3 Diagrammatic explanation of the physical signs of anteromedial OA in the right knee (see text).

2. Usually the knee will not fully extend. If the ACL remains intact and functional, the fixed flexion deformity is rarely more than 15°.

3. Flexion range is usually limited but is rarely less than 110°. Flexion less than 110° is a relative contraindication to OUKA because of the difficulty it presents at surgery. However, more flexion can usually be achieved under anaesthesia than in the clinic, particularly if the limitation is due to severe pain rather than stiffness of the joint.

4. Moderate synovial swelling and joint effusion are common, and there is often tenderness to palpation over the medial joint line.

It should be noted that the ‘pivot shift’, the drawer test, and other manoeuvres designed to assess the cruciate ligaments after trauma are of much less value in the arthritic knee. Erroneous conclusions may result from false instability, due to intact ligaments being rendered slack by loss of articular cartilage height, or from false stability, due to interpenetration of the damaged articular surfaces, or the presence of large osteophytes, which mask ligament insufficiency. These tests are not used in preoperative decision-making.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Correctable varus deformity
  • Full-thickness cartilage in the lateral compartment
  • Discussion of indications
  • Summary of indications
  • ACL damage
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs