• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • UKA versus TKA
    • Unicompartmental implant design
    • The Oxford Knee
    • Instrumentation
    • Lateral arthroplasty
    • Fixed bearings
    • Indications
    • References

Instrumentation

103 views 0

In 2012, a new set of instruments, called Microplasty (Fig 1.9), was introduced so as to make the operation more reliable. They are a substantial improvement compared to the original Phase 3 instrumentation. For example, they help with achieving the correct tibial resection height; they facilitate positioning of the femoral component and have a system for preventing impingement. The instruments have been optimised for use with the two peg cementless as well as the two peg cemented component.

 

Figure 1.9. The Microplasty femoral drill guide.

Also in 2012, the Signature patient specific instrumentation for the Oxford Knee was introduced. An MRI scan is obtained pre-operatively and, based on this, the provisional position of the components is determined. The surgeon then has the opportunity to adjust the positioning. Once the correct positioning is confirmed, patient specific guides are produced. During the operation, these are applied and control the positioning of the components although final balancing is achieved using traditional instrumentation. The Signature instruments currently are not as reliable as Microplasty so are not recommended for inexperienced surgeons (Alvand et al., 2015; Barrington & Emerson, 2013). However, it is expected that with time they will improve.

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Indications
  • Fixed bearings
  • Lateral arthroplasty
  • The Oxford Knee
  • Unicompartmental implant design
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs