• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 11: Management of Complications
    • Infection
    • Medial tibial plateau fracture
      • Treatment
    • Dislocation of a mobile bearing
      • Treatment
    • Loosening of a fixed component
    • Loosening of cementless components
    • Lateral compartment arthritis
    • Pain
      • Prevention and treatment
    • Limited motion
    • Recurrent haemarthrosis
    • Implant fracture
    • Results of revision surgery
    • References

Treatment

20 views 0

Manipulation can result in relocation. On a few occasions reduction has occurred, more or less spontaneously, under anaesthesia. However, arthrotomy is almost always required to remove the bearing and to determine the cause of its displacement. The bearing can usually be retrieved through a small anterior incision, even if it is in the back of the joint, but an additional posterior arthrotomy has sometimes been needed. We are aware of two cases in which the bearing, which could not be retrieved from the back of the knee, was left in the knee and did not cause problems (Tibrewal et al, 2014). The femoral component was dislodged on one occasion while retrieving the bearing and was successfully re-cemented.

Primary dislocation

When both the metal components are found to be securely fixed to the bones, other causes of dislocation need to be sought.

Any bone or cement that might impinge on the bearing is removed. Retained posterior femoral osteophytes can be removed with the posterior osteophyte chisel. An anatomical bearing, usually one size thicker, is inserted (see Fig. 6.14). It is important not to over tighten the ligaments.

If there is recurrent dislocation, MCL damage or a serious mismatch between the 110° and 20° flexion gaps, TKA should be performed. Since the introduction of a fixed-bearing tibial plateau to articulate with the OUKA femoral component, some surgeons have converted to this in cases where instability of the mobile bearing is the only defect in the arthroplasty. However, it should be noted that Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry data demonstrate that revisions of failed UKA to another UKA have generally been less successful than revisions from UKA to TKA (Hang et al, 2010). Recurrent dislocation is rare and should be treated by conversion to TKA.

Secondary dislocation

This is dealt with in the section below on loosening of a fixed component.

Traumatic dislocation

The few patients in which this has occurred have been successfully managed by either closed reduction of the displaced bearing or open insertion of a new bearing.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Results of revision surgery
  • Implant fracture
  • Recurrent haemarthrosis
  • Limited motion
  • Prevention and treatment
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs