• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Intraoperative local anaesthesia
    • Blood loss
    • Rehabilitation
    • Postoperative radiology
    • Tibial component
    • Femoral component
    • Impingement
    • Radiolucent lines
    • Cementless OUKA
    • References

References

14 views 0

Beard DJ, Murray DW, Rees JL, Price AJ & Dodd CA. Accelerated recovery for unicompartmental knee replacement–a feasibility study. Knee 2002; 9(3): 221-4. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(02)00016-9

Berger RA, Nedeff DD, Barden RM, Sheinkop MM, Jacobs JJ, Rosenberg AG & Galante JO. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clinical experience at 6- to 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1999; (367): 50-60. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-199910000-00007

Gondusky JS, Choi L, Khalaf N, Patel J, Barnett S & Gorab R. Day of surgery discharge after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an effective perioperative pathway. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(3): 516-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2013.08.021

Gulati A, Chau R, Simpson DJ, Dodd CA, Gill HS & Murray DW. Influence of component alignment on outcome for unicompartmental knee replacement. Knee 2009; 16(3): 196-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2008.11.001

Kendrick BJ, Kaptein BL, Valstar ER, Gill HS, Jackson WF, Dodd CA, Price AJ & Murray DW. Cemented versus cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using radiostereometric analysis: A randomised controlled trial. Bone Joint J 2015; 97-B(2): 185-91. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.97B2.34331

Kerr DR & Kohan L. Local infiltration analgesia: a technique for the control of acute postoperative pain following knee and hip surgery: a case study of 325 patients. Acta Orthop 2008; 79(2): 174-83. https://doi.org/10.1080/17453670710014950

Li MG, Yao F, Joss B, Ioppolo J, Nivbrant B, Wood D. Mobile vs. fixed bearing unicondylar knee arthroplasty: A randomized study on short term clinical outcomes and knee kinematics. Knee 2006; 13(5): 365-70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2006.05.003

O’Connor J, Goodfellow J & Perry N. Fixation of the tibial components of the Oxford Knee. Orthop Clin Nth America. 1982;13:65-87.

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Beard DJ, Gallagher J, Price AJ, Dodd CA, Goodfellow JW & Murray DW. Cementless Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement shows reduced radiolucency at one year. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2009; 91(2): 185-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.91B2.21413

Patel JN, Spanyer JM, Smith LS, Huang J, Yakkanti MR & Malkani AL. Comparison of intravenous versus topical tranexamic acid in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2014; 29(8): 1528-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2014.03.011

Reilly KA, Beard DJ, Barker KL, Dodd CA, Price AJ & Murray DW. Efficacy of an accelerated recovery protocol for Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty – a randomised controlled trial. Knee 2005; 12(5): 351-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2005.01.002

Repicci JA, Eberle RW. Minimally invasive surgical technique for unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J South Orthop Assoc 1999; 8(1): 20-7; discussion 7.

Shakespeare D, Jeffcote B. Unicondylar arthroplasty of the knee – cheap at half the price? Knee 2003; 10(4): 357-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0968-0160(03)00046-2

Tibrewal SB, Grant KA & Goodfellow JW. The radiolucent line beneath the tibial components of the Oxford meniscal knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1984; 66(4): 523-8. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.66B4.6746686

Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, Psychoyios V, Bonomo A, Howell G, O‘Connor J & Goodfellow JW. Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1999; 81(5): 783-9. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.81B5.0810783

Weston-Simons JS, Pandit H, Haliker V, Dodd CA, Popat MT & Murray DW. Intra-articular local anaesthetic on the day after surgery improves pain and patient satisfaction after Unicompartmental Knee Replacement: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 2012; 19(4): 352-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knee.2011.04.010

Zhang Q, Zhang Q, Guo W, Liu Z, Cheng L & Zhu G. No need for use of drainage after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized, controlled trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2015; 135(5): 709-13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-015-2192-z

 

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Cementless OUKA
  • Radiolucent lines
  • Impingement
  • Femoral component
  • Tibial component
  • Postoperative radiology
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs