• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • The unloaded human knee
      • Relative movements of the articular surfaces
      • Ligaments
      • Parallel spatial mechanism model of the knee
      • Four-bar linkage model of the knee in the sagittal plane
      • Ligament fibre arrays
    • The unloaded prosthetic knee
    • The loaded human knee
    • Passive anteroposterior laxity of the knee
      • Isometric quadriceps contractions
    • The loaded prosthetic knee
    • Bearing movement in activity
    • References

Parallel spatial mechanism model of the knee

56 views 0

The Appendix to this book describes a three-dimensional mathematical model of passive knee flexion which is predictive of the coupling of axial rotation, ab/adduction and three components of translation of one bone relative to each other (Fig. 3.13). Indeed, the solid lines in the five graphs of Figure 3.3 were calculated from the model and fit the experimental values quite well, giving confidence in the relevance of the model and the assumptions on which it is based.

Figure 3.13. Parallel spatial mechanism model of the knee at extension, 60° and 120° flexion. The surfaces of the femoral condyles remain in continuous contact with the tibial plateaux while the isometric fibres of the ACL (red), PCL (green) and MCL (blue) rotate about their insertions on the tibia.

The formulation of the model assumes that passive motion of the knee is constrained by isometric ligament fibres in the ACL, the PCL and the MCL and by continuous contact between the articular surfaces of the medial and the lateral compartments (Feikes, 1999; Wilson, 1995; Wilson et al., 1998; Feikes et al., 2003). The mathematical formulation was based on the assumptions that, during passive motion, the ligament fibres do not stretch or shorten and that the articular surfaces in each compartment do not separate or interpenetrate. These five constraints to motion reduce the possible six degrees of freedom of the tibia relative to the femur to unity, a single degree of freedom system, and explain the coupling of five components of movement at the joint to flexion angle observed experimentally (Figs. 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4)). The model is a theory of the screw-home mechanism. Figure 3.13 and the animation of the model (see website www.oxfordpartialknee.com, Animation 1) show the external rotation of the femur on a fixed tibia during flexion, internal rotation during extension. The five constraints can be satisfied during passive motion because the articular surfaces, while remaining continuously in contact, are free to roll and slide on each other and the three ligament fibres, while remaining isometric, can rotate about their points of origin and insertion on the bones. These movements can occur without tissue deformation, without stretching of ligament fibres or indentation of articular surfaces, suggesting that, during passive motion, the human knee has one degree of unresisted freedom.

The model reinforces the conclusions from Figure 3.6 above that intact articular surfaces and intact ligaments are necessary to achieve the ordered passive movement of the human knee. It suggests that the practice in current total knee replacement of sacrificing the cruciate ligaments and releasing the deep fibres of the MCL is unlikely to restore ordered movement. It seems improbable that additions or projections to the articular surfaces of a prosthesis (which resist interpenetration but not separation) can replace the ligamentous constraints which resist separation but not interpenetration.

Next>>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Bearing movement in activity
  • The loaded prosthetic knee
  • Isometric quadriceps contractions
  • Passive anteroposterior laxity of the knee
  • The loaded human knee
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs