• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • The size of the femoral component
    • Positioning the limb
    • Incision
    • Excision of osteophytes
    • Tibial saw cut
      • The vertical tibial cut
      • The horizontal tibial cut
    • The femoral drill holes and alignment
    • Femoral saw cut
    • Milling the condyle
      • Measuring the flexion and extension gaps
      • Second and third milling
      • Preventing impingement
    • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
    • Final preparation of the tibial plateau
    • Final trial reduction
    • Cementing the components
    • Cementless: Component impaction
    • Bearing insertion
    • Instruments
      • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
      • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
      • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
      • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
      • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54

Tibial saw cut

126 views 0

With the knee in 110° flexion, insert the femoral sizing spoon [23] (of appropriate size based on the pre-operative estimate) and 1 mm thick under the centre of the medial condyle. Its handle should lie approximately parallel with the long axis of the femur. With all retraction removed, assess the ligament tension by twisting the spoon. It should freely twist about 20° in both directions. Usually the 1 mm thick femoral sizing spoon achieves the proper ligament tension; if not, replace it with a thicker sizing spoon until the proper tension is achieved. The optimal size of the femoral component is confirmed by examining the relationship of the front of the spoon and the surface of the eburnated bone. Ideally it should be 3 to 5 mm above the surface approximately where the cartilage surface of the femur would have been before the arthritis. Once the appropriate spoon is inserted, apply a self retaining retractor which locks it in place.

Figure 7.8 (a) The correct femoral sizing spoon in place with a gap of about 5 mm between the spoon and the eburnated bone. (b) Femoral spoon (the grey spoon is the correct size; the pink is too large).

Apply the tibial saw guide assembly [21, 25 & 53], with its shaft parallel with long axis of the tibia in both planes (Fig. 7.9). The ankle yoke [25] should be pointing towards the ipsilateral anterior superior iliac spine (ASIS). The tibial saw guide has 7° of posterior slope built in. The zero shim [20] should be in place.

Figure 7.9 The assembled tibial saw guide in situ.

The femoral sizing spoon, tibial saw guide and G-clamp [27], when used together, will accurately establish the level of bone resection (this can be seen in the video at www.oxfordpartialknee.com). Select either the 3 or the 4 G-clamp and apply to the femoral sizing spoon and to the medial side of the tibial saw guide to ensure access to pin holes in the guide. Although there is an option to adjust the height of the tibial cut using different shims [20], the zero shim must always be used with the G-clamp. In general, a 3 G-clamp is used for Extra Small and Small femurs and 4 for the rest although surgeons starting out with the OUKA should use the 4 G-clamp.

Confirm that the knee is flexed to 110°. Manipulate the upper end of the guide so that its face lies against the exposed bone. Push the guide laterally so its recess accommodates the patellar tendon (Fig. 7.10). Engage the cam on the G-clamp, by pulling the lever downwards, to lock the three components together. Fix the saw guide in place using a headed pin [4] through the central or lateral hole in the tibial saw guide. Unlock the G-clamp and remove along with the femoral sizing spoon.

Figure 7.10 Tibial saw guide and femoral sizing spoon assembled in situ and held together by the G-clamp.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
  • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
  • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54
  • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
  • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
  • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs