• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • The size of the femoral component
    • Positioning the limb
    • Incision
    • Excision of osteophytes
    • Tibial saw cut
      • The vertical tibial cut
      • The horizontal tibial cut
    • The femoral drill holes and alignment
    • Femoral saw cut
    • Milling the condyle
      • Measuring the flexion and extension gaps
      • Second and third milling
      • Preventing impingement
    • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
    • Final preparation of the tibial plateau
    • Final trial reduction
    • Cementing the components
    • Cementless: Component impaction
    • Bearing insertion
    • Instruments
      • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
      • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
      • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
      • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
      • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54

Preventing impingement

48 views 0

Apply the anti-impingement guide [45] to the condyle (Fig. 7.23(a)), and use the anterior mill assembly [28, 32, 42] to remove anterior bone and create clearance for the front of the bearing in full extension. Take great care to ensure the mill does not damage the tibia or patella. Before starting the mill, engage it on the peg and ensure the spring loaded mechanism moves freely. When milling, push firmly in the direction of the peg axis, taking care not to tilt the mill. Mill until the cutter will not advance further.

Figure 7.23(a)

Leave the anti-impingement guide in place and use the osteophyte chisel [49] to remove any posterior osteophytes (Fig. 7.23(b)). This should be done medially and laterally as well as centrally. Remove the guide and, using the osteophyte chisel, break off any attached osteophytes and sweep them down off the posterior capsule, and remove them. If possible palpate, with a little finger, the proximal part of the condyle to ensure all posterior osteophytes are removed.

Figure 7.23(b)

Insert the tibial template, the twin peg femoral trial component [44 or 50] and a trial bearing [48] of appropriate thickness (as determined when measuring flexion and extension gaps). With these components in place, manipulate the knee through a full range of motion to ensure there is no impingement of bone against the bearing in full extension and full flexion (Figs. 7.24(a) and (b)). If the bearing impinges in flexion, the knee will open up like a book. If this happens, the osteophyte chisel should be used again to ensure all posterior osteophytes are removed.

Figure 7.24(a)

Figure 7.24(b)

Ensure the bearing is not jammed against the vertical wall. If a narrow dissector put between the bearing and the wall is gripped by the bearing, consider redoing the vertical tibial cut 2 mm more laterally.

Remove the trial bearing and femoral trial component using the appropriate extractor [15] and slap hammer [9].

Note: Gap gauges are used to measure the gaps because they do not stretch the ligaments. The meniscal bearings have a 3 mm high posterior lip which, after multiple insertions, may stretch the ligaments.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
  • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
  • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54
  • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
  • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
  • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs