• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Patellofemoral arthritis
    • Discussion
    • Lateral side
    • Age
    • Activity level
    • Weight
    • Chondrocalcinosis
    • What proportion of patients with osteoarthritic knees needing surgery is suitable for OUKA?
    • References

References

14 views 0

9Ali A, Pandit H, Liddle AD, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2015. Does activity affect the outcome of the Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement? British Association for Surgery of the Knee Annual Meeting. Telford.

Altman RD, Fries JF, Bloch DA, Carstens J, Cooke TD, Genant H, Gofton P, Groth H, McShane DJ, Murphy WA & et al. 1987. Radiographic assessment of progression in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum, 30, 1214-25. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3689459

Argenson JN, Blanc G, Aubaniac JM & Parratte S 2013. Modern unicompartmental knee arthroplasty with cement: a concise follow-up, at a mean of twenty years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, 905-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23677357

Argenson JN, Komistek RD, Aubaniac JM, Dennis DA, Northcut EJ, Anderson DT & Agostini S 2002. In vivo determination of knee kinematics for subjects implanted with a unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty, 17, 1049-54. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12478517

Argenson JN & O’Connor JJ 1992. Polyethylene wear in meniscal knee replacement. A one to nine-year retrieval analysis of the Oxford knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 74, 228-32. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1544958

Ashraf T, Newman JH, Desai VV, Beard D & Nevelos JE 2004. Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis. Knee, 11, 177-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15194092

Beard DJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Hollinghurst D, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2007a. The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, 1597-601. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18057359

Beard DJ, Pandit H, Ostlere S, Jenkins C, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2007b. Pre-operative clinical and radiological assessment of the patellofemoral joint in unicompartmental knee replacement and its influence on outcome. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 89, 1602-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18057360

Berend KR, Lombardi AV, Morris MJ & Hurst JM 2011. Does preoperative patellofemoral joint state affect medical unicompartmental arthroplasty survival? (P204). AAOS. San Diego, USA.

Berger RA, Meneghini RM, Jacobs JJ, Sheinkop MB, Della Valle CJ, Rosenberg AG & Galante JO 2005. Results of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at a minimum of ten years of follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 87, 999-1006. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15866962

Carr A, Keyes G, Miller R, O’Connor J & Goodfellow J 1993. Medial unicompartmental arthroplasty. A survival study of the Oxford meniscal knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 205-13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8403650

Emery IH & Meachim G 1973. Surface morphology and topography of patello-femoral cartilage fibrillation in Liverpool necropsies. J Anat, 116, 103-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4777777

Goodfellow J, Hungerford DS & Zindel M 1976. Patello-femoral joint mechanics and pathology. 1. Functional anatomy of the patello-femoral joint. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 58, 287-90. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/956243

Goodfellow JW & O’Connor J 1986. Clinical results of the Oxford knee. Surface arthroplasty of the tibiofemoral joint with a meniscal bearing prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 21-42. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3698380

Hernigou P & Deschamps G 2002. Patellar impingement following unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 84, 1132-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12107311

Kendrick BJ, Rout R, Bottomley NJ, Pandit H, Gill HS, Price AJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2010. The implications of damage to the lateral femoral condyle on medial unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92, 374-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20190308

Kozinn SC, Marx C & Scott RD 1989. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A 4.5-6-year follow-up study with a metal-backed tibial component. J Arthroplasty, 4 Suppl, S1-10. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2584981

Kozinn SC & Scott R 1989. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71, 145-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2643607

Kuipers BM, Kollen BJ, Bots PC, Burger BJ, van Raay JJ, Tulp NJ & Verheyen CC 2010. Factors associated with reduced early survival in the Oxford phase III medial unicompartment knee replacement. Knee, 17, 48-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19716706

Kumar V, Pandit HG, Liddle AD, Borror W, Jenkins C, Mellon SJ, Hamilton TW, Athanasou N, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2017. Comparison of outcomes after UKA in patients with and without chondrocalcinosis: a matched cohort study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc, 25, 319-324. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25786825

Liddle AD, Judge A, Pandit H & Murray DW 2014. Determinants of revision and functional outcome following unicompartmental knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 22, 1241-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25042552

Lidgren L, Knutson K & Robertsson O 2004. Swedish Knee Arthroplasty Register. Annual Report. Lund.

Miller RK, Goodfellow JW, Murray DW & O’Connor JJ 1998. In vitro measurement of patellofemoral force after three types of knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 900-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9768906

Murray DW, Goodfellow JW & O’Connor JJ 1998. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 983-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9853489

Murray DW, Pandit H, Weston-Simons JS, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Lombardi AV, Dodd CA & Berend KR 2013. Does body mass index affect the outcome of unicompartmental knee replacement? Knee, 20, 461-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23110877

Niinimaki TT, Murray DW, Partanen J, Pajala A & Leppilahti JI 2011. Unicompartmental knee arthroplasties implanted for osteoarthritis with partial loss of joint space have high re-operation rates. Knee, 18, 432-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21093269

Outerbridge RE 1961. The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 43-B, 752-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmirurg Scand.

Pandit H, Gulati A, Jenkins C, Barker K, Price AJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2011a. Unicompartmental knee replacement for patients with partial thickness cartilage loss in the affected compartment. Knee, 18, 168-71. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20627734

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Barker K, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2011b. Minimally invasive Oxford phase 3 unicompartmental knee replacement: results of 1000 cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93, 198-204. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21282759

Pandit H, Jenkins C, Gill HS, Smith G, Price AJ, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2011c. Unnecessary contraindications for mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 93, 622-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21511927

Price AJ, Dodd CA, Svard UG & Murray DW 2005. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in patients younger and older than 60 years of age. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 87, 1488-92. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16260664

Price AJ, Longino D, Svard U, Kim K, Weber P, Fiddian N, Shakespeare D, Keys GW, Beard D, Pandit H, Dodd CA & Murray DW 2010. Seven year survival analysis of mobile bearing UKA in patients 50 years of age or less. J Bone Joint Surg [Br], 92-B, 412.

Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ, Gill RH, Dodd CA & Murray DM 2004. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty, 19, 590-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15284980

Price AJ & Svard U 2011. A second decade lifetable survival analysis of the Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 469, 174-9. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20706811

Psychoyios V, Crawford RW, O’Connor JJ & Murray DW 1998. Wear of congruent meniscal bearings in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a retrieval study of 16 specimens. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 976-82. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9853488

Ritter MA, Faris PM, Thong AE, Davis KE, Meding JB & Berend ME 2004. Intra-operative findings in varus osteoarthritis of the knee. An analysis of pre-operative alignment in potential candidates for unicompartmental arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 86, 43-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14765864

Sisto DJ, Blazina ME, Heskiaoff D & Hirsh LC 1993. Unicompartment arthroplasty for osteoarthrosis of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 149-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8425336

Stern SH, Becker MW & Insall JN 1993. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. An evaluation of selection criteria. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 143-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8425335

Svard UC & Price AJ 2001. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83, 191-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11284563

Weale AE, Murray DW, Crawford R, Psychoyios V, Bonomo A, Howell G, O’Connor J & Goodfellow JW 1999. Does arthritis progress in the retained compartments after ‘Oxford’ medial unicompartmental arthroplasty? A clinical and radiological study with a minimum ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 81, 783-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10530837

Wiles P, Andrews PS & Devas MB 1956. Chondromalacia of the patella. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 38-B, 95-113. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/13295323

Witvoet J, Peyrache MD & Nizard R 1993. [Single-compartment “Lotus” type knee prosthesis in the treatment of lateralized gonarthrosis: results in 135 cases with a mean follow-up of 4.6 years]. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot, 79, 565-76. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8085038

Woods D, Wallace D, Woods C, McLardy-Smith P, Carr AJ, Murray DW, Martin J & Gunther T 1995. Chondrocalcinosis and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee, 2, 117-19.

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • What proportion of patients with osteoarthritic knees needing surgery is suitable for OUKA?
  • Chondrocalcinosis
  • Weight
  • Activity level
  • Age
  • Lateral side
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs