• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Patellofemoral arthritis
    • Discussion
    • Lateral side
    • Age
    • Activity level
    • Weight
    • Chondrocalcinosis
    • What proportion of patients with osteoarthritic knees needing surgery is suitable for OUKA?
    • References

Activity level

22 views 0

In a series of 1000 medial OUKA followed up to 15 years, we assessed the postoperative activity level using the Tegner Score (Kozinn & Scott, 1989). Patients with higher levels of activity, not surprisingly, had higher OKS (Ali et al. 2015). However, contrary to accepted wisdom, there was a significant reduction in revision rate associated with increased activity (Fig. 5.6). In general, impact activity is not recommended after joint replacement. This level of activity would be 5 or more on the Tegner scale (5 being ‘jogging on uneven ground’ or ‘heavy labour’). We found that the 115 patients with a Tegner score of five or more had an OKS of 45 and 12-year survival of 97.3%, whereas the 885 with Tegner 4 or less had OKS of 39.9 and 12-year survival of 94.0%. It is not clear why the survival improves with increased activity. It may be that the bone and cartilage are stronger in more active patients so failures due to loosening or disease progression are less likely to occur. Also with the mobile bearing, failure due to wear should not occur. Whatever the reason it is clear that, after OUKA, activity should be encouraged not discouraged. Furthermore, provided the patients have significant symptoms, high levels of activity or expectations of achieving high levels of activity should not be considered to be a contraindication to OUKA.

Figure 5.6 The effect of activity level (as scored by maximum postoperative Tegner Score) on the 12-year survival rate and OKS.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • What proportion of patients with osteoarthritic knees needing surgery is suitable for OUKA?
  • Chondrocalcinosis
  • Weight
  • Age
  • Lateral side
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs