• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 12: The Lateral Side
    • Anatomy and kinematics
    • Pathology
    • History and development of the Lateral Oxford UKA
    • Indications
    • Surgical technique domed lateral UKR
      • Vertical and horizontal cuts
      • Femoral preparation
      • Final preparation
    • Results
      • The management of a dislocated bearing
    • References

Pathology

25 views 0

The pattern of cartilage and bone erosion seen in anteromedial arthritis is not found on the lateral side (Harman et al., 1998). Medial unicompartmental OA is a disease of extension whereas lateral unicompartmental OA is a disease of flexion. On the lateral side, the cartilage and bone erosions tend to begin in the central part of the tibial plateau which is in contact with the femur at about 45° flexion. On the femoral side, there is a kissing lesion at about 45° flexion. The lesion then expands both anteriorly and posteriorly. As a result there is usually some retained cartilage on the femur in extension and 90° flexion (Gulati et al., 2009).

Gulati et al. (2009) reported the patterns of osteoarthritis (OA) in both medial and lateral unicompartmental OA of the knee. Forty patients with medial and 20 with lateral unicompartmental knee osteoarthritis were studied to determine the location of full thickness cartilage lesions. Intra-operatively, the distance between margins of the lesion and reference lines were measured. The femoral measurements were transposed onto lateral radiographs to determine the relationship between the lesion site and knee flexion angles. Both tibial and femoral lesions were significantly (p<0.01) more posterior in lateral OA than medial OA. In medial OA, the lesion centre was, on average, at 11° (SD 3°) of flexion, whereas in lateral OA it was at 40° (SD 3°). The smallest medial femoral lesions were near full extension and, as they enlarged, they extended posteriorly. The smallest lateral femoral lesions extended from 20° to 60° flexion. As these lesions enlarged, they extended both anteriorly and posteriorly. There was a well-defined relationship between the site of the lesions and their size, suggesting that they develop and progress in a predictable manner (Fig. 12.2). The relationship was different for medial and lateral OA, suggesting that different mechanical factors are important in initiating the different types of OA. The lesions in medial OA occur in extension, perhaps initiated by events occurring at heel strike (Gill & O’Connor, 2003). The lesions in lateral OA begin at flexion angles above those occurring during the single leg stance phase of the gait cycle, so activities other than gait are likely to induce lateral OA.

Figure 12.2 The site (Knee Flexion Angle (KFA)) of the anterior (triangle) and posterior (circle) extent of the full thickness lesion compared to its length in medial OA (red) and lateral OA (green).

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • The management of a dislocated bearing
  • Results
  • Final preparation
  • Femoral preparation
  • Vertical and horizontal cuts
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs