• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • The size of the femoral component
    • Positioning the limb
    • Incision
    • Excision of osteophytes
    • Tibial saw cut
      • The vertical tibial cut
      • The horizontal tibial cut
    • The femoral drill holes and alignment
    • Femoral saw cut
    • Milling the condyle
      • Measuring the flexion and extension gaps
      • Second and third milling
      • Preventing impingement
    • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
    • Final preparation of the tibial plateau
    • Final trial reduction
    • Cementing the components
    • Cementless: Component impaction
    • Bearing insertion
    • Instruments
      • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
      • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
      • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
      • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
      • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54

Measuring the flexion and extension gaps

167 views 0

Measuring the flexion gap

Insert the tibial template [1] and apply the single peg femoral trial component [40] or, if available, the 2-peg without anterior extension (2-peg femoral US), to the milled condyle, tapping it home while holding the femoral impactor [31] angled at 45° to the femoral axis (Fig 7.20).

Figure 7.20 (a) Oxford single peg femoral component, (b) two-peg femoral component and (c) two-peg femoral component (US).

With the knee in about 110° of flexion and retractors removed, carefully measure the flexion gap with the gap gauges [47] (Fig. 7.21(a)). (In the unlikely event that the 3 mm gauge cannot be inserted, replace the tibial cutting guide and redo the tibial cut without the shim.) The gauge thickness is correct when natural tension in the ligaments is achieved. In these circumstances, the gap gauge when held between finger and thumb will easily slide in and out, but will not tilt. Confirmation of the correct thickness is obtained by demonstrating that a 1 mm thicker gauge is firmly gripped and a 1 mm thinner gauge is toggling loosely.

Figure 7.21 (a) The flexion gap is measured at 110° knee flexion.

Figure 7.21 (b) The extension gap measured at 20° knee flexion.

Measuring the extension gap

Having measured the flexion gap (say 4 mm), remove the gap gauge, fully extend the knee then flex to about 20° flexion. The surgeon should hold the leg and apply a gentle valgus load to take up any slack in the MCL. Use the gap gauges to measure the extension gap (say 1 mm) which is always less than, or equal to, the flexion gap. Confirm the size of the gap by using a gap gauge 1 mm thicker and 1 mm thinner. If a 1 mm gauge is too tight or cannot be inserted, assume the extension gap is zero. Calculate the amount of bone to remove by subtracting the extension gap from the flexion gap (4 – 1 = 3). It is therefore necessary to remove a further 3 mm of bone from the inferior femoral condyle (see The femoral component). The spigots (numbered 1–7) allow bone to be removed in measured quantities (in mm) from the level of the first mill cut. The number 3 spigot removes 3 mm, so should be used. If the surgeon is not certain how much bone to remove it is best to be cautious and remove too little rather than too much.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
  • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
  • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54
  • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
  • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
  • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs