• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • The size of the femoral component
    • Positioning the limb
    • Incision
    • Excision of osteophytes
    • Tibial saw cut
      • The vertical tibial cut
      • The horizontal tibial cut
    • The femoral drill holes and alignment
    • Femoral saw cut
    • Milling the condyle
      • Measuring the flexion and extension gaps
      • Second and third milling
      • Preventing impingement
    • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
    • Final preparation of the tibial plateau
    • Final trial reduction
    • Cementing the components
    • Cementless: Component impaction
    • Bearing insertion
    • Instruments
      • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
      • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
      • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
      • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
      • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54

Cementless: Component impaction

89 views 0

The cementless implants are impacted into the bone, tibial component first. It is essential that a small toffee hammer is used for impaction – a heavy hammer can cause a fracture. The tibial implant is assembled into the introducer/impactor [16] by locating its lugs into the recesses on the underside of the implant and tightening the thumb wheel (Fig 7.32).

Figure 7.32

The component is then carefully impacted into the bone (Fig. 7.33).

Figure 7.33

The keel is carefully driven into the keel slot from the front. The knee is fully flexed so the upper surface of the impactor is parallel to the posterior femoral saw cut thus increasing the available space. The component is impacted at an angle to the tibial surface so its posterior edge slides along the tibial surface thus pushing soft tissue out of the way. When the front of the component has reached the position where the front of the template was, the component is impacted down.

Before the implant is fully seated, the introducer/impactor is removed by unscrewing the thumb wheel. Using a small dissector, any soft tissue interposed between the implant and bone is swept out. Small adjustments can be made to the AP position of the component by using the side of the handle of the plastic cement removal chisel or a punch. Final impaction of the tibial component is achieved with the standard tibial impactor, placed over the centre of the keel.

Often the tibial component does not seat down fully and may be 0.5 mm proud. This should be accepted as it will subside with time. Attempting to hit it hard with a heavy hammer may cause a fracture.

Impaction of the femoral component is achieved with the standard impactor (Fig 7.28), used in line with the main peg hole. It is essential that a light hammer is used for impaction – a heavy hammer can be a cause of fracture. Both components are examined to ensure they are fully seated.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Set 1: Tools 1 to 14
  • Milling the condyle with Tool-pics
  • Set 5: Tools 51 to 54
  • Set 4: Tools 39 to 50
  • Set 3: Tools 25 to 38
  • Set 2: Tools 15 to 24
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs