• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact

Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

42 views 0 November 4, 2023 84r534564r4

Zhu X, Xu H, Wang L, Zhang H, Chen H, Wang J, Zhang H. Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2023;44:227-35. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37677873

BACKGROUND: The significance of lateral meniscus injury and its impact on success rates with medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is still debated among scholars. This study aims to investigate whether preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of lateral meniscus injury influence midterm outcomes following UKA. METHODS: This study recruited 104 patients who underwent medial mobile-bearing UKA. Based on the extent of lateral meniscus injury indicated by the preoperative MRI and Stoller’s classification system, patients were divided into two groups: the normal group (grade 0), and the lateral meniscus injury group (grade 3). Further, preoperative demographic and clinical outcome data (Hospital for Special Surgery score, lateral knee pain, squatting, and knee extension ability) were compared at least 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference in knee function or clinical outcome was found between the normal group (n = 59) and the lateral meniscus injury group (n = 45). During the 39.2 months (range: 24-64 months), no patient required any reoperation or revision procedures. CONCLUSION: In summary, the presence of lateral meniscus injury as determined by preoperative MRI does not affect the midterm results after UKA. Without additional treatment for lateral meniscus injury, UKA can yield desired outcomes regardless of the presence of lateral meniscus injury on preoperative MRI.

 

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • NEW PUBLICATION Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures
  • A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision
  • Kinematically Aligned Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using the Microplasty Instrumentation System
  • Incidence and severity of radiological lateral osteoarthritis 15 years following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • The effect of tibial component rotational alignment on clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision
Search
Publications
  • Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • NEW PUBLICATION Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures
  • A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision
  • Kinematically Aligned Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using the Microplasty Instrumentation System
  • Incidence and severity of radiological lateral osteoarthritis 15 years following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • The effect of tibial component rotational alignment on clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
View All 16  
Publication Categories
  • Knowledge Base – Post Features
  • Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties
  • Publications

  Incidence and severity of radiological lateral osteoarthritis 15 years following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Early Recovery Following Total and Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Assessed Using Novel Patient-Reported Measures  

The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs