• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact

A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision

43 views 0 August 12, 2023 84r534564r4

Zhang, G., Smith, B. P., Plate, J. F., Casanova, R., Hsu, F. C., Li, J., Xia, L., Li, K. C., Poehling, G. G., Zhou, X.

Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24 (6):  991-9

OBJECTIVE: Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) revision is usually due to the degenerative degree of knee articular osteochondral tissue in the untreated compartment. However, it is difficult to simulate the biomechanical behavior on this tissue accurately. This study presents and validates a reliable system to predict which osteoarthritis (OA) patients may suffer revision as a result of biomechanical reasons after having UKA. DESIGN: We collected all revision cases available (n = 11) and randomly selected 67 UKA cases to keep the revision prevalence of almost 14%. All these 78 cases have been followed at least 2 years. An elastic model is designed to characterize the biomechanical behavior of the articular osteochondral tissue for each patient. After calculated the force on the tissue, finite element method (FEM) is applied to calculating the strain of each tissue node. Kernel Ridge Regression (KRR) method is used to model the relationship between the strain information and the risk of revision. Therefore, the risk of UKA revision can be predicted by this integrated model. RESULTS: Leave-one-out (LOO) cross-validation (CV) is implemented to assess the prediction accuracy. As a result, the mean prediction accuracy is 93.58% for all these cases, demonstrating the high value of this model as a decision-making assistant for surgical plaining of knee OA. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study demonstrated that this integrated model can predict the risk of UKA revision with theoretically high accuracy. It combines bio-mechanical and statistical learning approach to create a surgical planning tool which may support clinical decision in the future.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2016.01.004

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • NEW PUBLICATION Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures
  • Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • Kinematically Aligned Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using the Microplasty Instrumentation System
  • Incidence and severity of radiological lateral osteoarthritis 15 years following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • The effect of tibial component rotational alignment on clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision
Search
Publications
  • A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision
  • NEW PUBLICATION Undersizing of the tibial component in Oxford unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) increases the risk of periprosthetic fractures
  • Impact of lateral meniscus injury detected by preoperative magnetic resonance imaging on midterm results after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • Kinematically Aligned Oxford Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using the Microplasty Instrumentation System
  • Incidence and severity of radiological lateral osteoarthritis 15 years following medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
  • The effect of tibial component rotational alignment on clinical outcomes of mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty
View All 16  
Publication Categories
  • Knowledge Base – Post Features
  • Unicompartmental Knee and Total Knee Arthroplasties
  • Publications

  Accuracy of Alignment of Femoral and Tibial Component of the Oxford Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Using Zimmer Microplasty

A systematic approach to predicting the risk of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty revision  

The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs