• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • UKA versus TKA
    • Unicompartmental implant design
    • The Oxford Knee
    • Instrumentation
    • Lateral arthroplasty
    • Fixed bearings
    • Indications
    • References

References

64 views 0

Ahlback, S 1968. Osteoarthrosis of the knee. A radiographic investigation. Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh), Suppl 277:7-72. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/5706059

Alvand, A, Khan, T, Jenkins, C, Rees, J, Jackson, W, Dodd, C & Price, A, 2015. The impact of patient-specific instrumentation (PSI) on surgical accuracy and functional outcome during unicompartmental knee replacement (UKR): A prospective randomised controlled study. British Association for Surgery of the Knee (BASK) Annual Meeting, Telford, UK.

Andrews, B, Willis-Owen, CA, Aquil, A & Cobb, JP, 2014. A cost-utility analysis of knee arthroplasty using data from three national registries Paper #668. AAOS. New Orleans.

Ashraf, T, Newman, JH, Desai, VV, Beard, D & Nevelos, JE 2004. Polyethylene wear in a non-congruous unicompartmental knee replacement: a retrieval analysis. Knee, 11, 177-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15194092

Baker, P, Jameson, S, Critchley, R, Reed, M, Gregg, P & Deehan, D, 2013. Center and surgeon volume influence the revision rate following unicondylar knee replacement: an analysis of 23,400 medial cemented unicondylar knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 95, 702-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23595068

Barrington, JW & Emerson, RH, 2010. The Oxford Knee: First report of 20-year follow-up in the US. AAOS. New Orleans. Paper no 422.

Barrington, JW & Emerson, RH, 2013. What is the most accurate insertion platform for a mobile-bearing UKA? A case-control, blinded radiographic analysis. Annual Meeting of the American Association of Hip and Knee Surgeons. Dallas, Tx, USA.

Cobb, JP 2014. Patient safety after partial and total knee replacement. Lancet, 384, 1405-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012117

Collier, MB, Engh, CA, Jr., Mcauley, JP & Engh, GA 2007. Factors associated with the loss of thickness of polyethylene tibial bearings after knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 89, 1306-14. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17545435

Forsythe, ME, Englund, RE & Leighton, RK 2000. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty: a cementless perspective. Can J Surg, 43, 417-24. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11129829

Goodfellow, JW, O’Connor, JJ, inventors; 1989. Oxford Knee (femoral). UK, French, German, Swiss Patent EP 0327397, Irish Patent 62951, US Patent 5314482.

Goodfellow, JW & O’Connor, JJ, 1992. The anterior cruciate ligament in knee arthroplasty. A risk-factor with unconstrained meniscal prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 245-52. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1537161

Goodfellow, JW, O’Connor, JJ & Murray, DW, 2010. A critique of revision rate as an outcome measure: re-interpretation of knee joint registry data. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 92, 1628-31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21119165

Goodfellow, JW, O’Connor, JJ & Shrive, NG, inventors; 1974. Endoprosthetic knee joint devices. British Patent Application 1534263.

Kozinn, SC & Scott, R, 1989. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 71, 145-50. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2643607

Laurencin, CT, Zelicof, SB, Scott, RD & Ewald, FC, 1991. Unicompartmental versus total knee arthroplasty in the same patient. A comparative study. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 151-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1959264

Liddle, AD, Judge, A, Pandit, H & Murray, DW, 2014. Adverse outcomes after total and unicompartmental knee replacement in 101,330 matched patients: a study of data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales. Lancet, 384, 1437-45. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25012116

Liddle, AD, Pandit, H, O’brien, S, Doran, E, Penny, ID, Hooper, GJ, Burn, PJ, Dodd, CA, Beverland, DE, Maxwell, AR & Murray, DW, 2013. Cementless fixation in Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: a multicentre study of 1000 knees. Bone Joint J, 95-B, 181-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23365026

Marmor, L, 1976. The Modular (Marmor) knee: case report with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 86-94. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/975671

Marmor, L, 1985. Unicompartmental and total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 75-81. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3967442

Marmor, L, 1998. Preface. Prothese Unicompartimentale du Genou. Paris: Expansion Scientifique.

Murray, DW, Goodfellow, JW & O’Connor, JJ, 1998. The Oxford medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: a ten-year survival study. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 80, 983-9. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9853489

Murray, DW, Marks, BE, Kontochristos, L, Dodd, CA & Pandit H, 2013. The Oxford unicompartmental knee replacement: long term results. Clin J Joint Surg, 7(4): 540-4.

Neider, E, 1991. Schlitten prothese, Rotations knie und Scharnierprothese modell St. Georg and Endo-Modell. Orthopade, 20: 170-80.

Palmer, SH, Morrison, PJ & Ross, AC, 1998. Early catastrophic tibial component wear after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 143-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9602813

Price, AJ, Webb, J, Topf, H, Dodd, CA, Goodfellow, JW, Murray, DW and the Oxford Hip and Knee Group, 2001. Rapid recovery after Oxford unicompartmental arthroplasty through a short incision. J Arthroplasty, 16, 970-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11740750

Robertsson, O, Borgquist, L, Knutson, K, Lewold, S & Lidgren, L, 1999. Use of unicompartmental instead of tricompartmental prostheses for unicompartmental arthrosis in the knee is a cost-effective alternative. 15,437 primary tricompartmental prostheses were compared with 10,624 primary medial or lateral unicompartmental prostheses. Acta Orthop Scand, 70, 170-5. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10366919

Rougraff, BT, Heck, DA & Gibson, AE, 1991. A comparison of tricompartmental and unicompartmental arthroplasty for the treatment of gonarthrosis. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 157-64. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1959265

Svard, UC & Price, AJ 2001. Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. A survival analysis of an independent series. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 83, 191-4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11284563

White, SH, Ludkowski, PF & Goodfellow, JW 1991. Anteromedial osteoarthritis of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 73, 582-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2071640

White, SH, Roberts, S & Jones, PW 2012. The Twin Peg Oxford partial knee replacement: the first 100 cases. Knee, 19, 36-40. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21251839

Willis-Owen, CA, Brust, K, Alsop, H, Miraldo, M & Cobb, JP 2009. Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: an analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacy. Knee, 16, 473-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19464898

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • Indications
  • Fixed bearings
  • Lateral arthroplasty
  • Instrumentation
  • The Oxford Knee
  • Unicompartmental implant design
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs