• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • The unloaded human knee
      • Relative movements of the articular surfaces
      • Ligaments
      • Parallel spatial mechanism model of the knee
      • Four-bar linkage model of the knee in the sagittal plane
      • Ligament fibre arrays
    • The unloaded prosthetic knee
    • The loaded human knee
    • Passive anteroposterior laxity of the knee
      • Isometric quadriceps contractions
    • The loaded prosthetic knee
    • Bearing movement in activity
    • References

The loaded prosthetic knee

40 views 0

Patellar tendon angle

The patellar tendon angle (PTA) is the angle in the sagittal plane between the tendon and the long axis of the tibia. Because of its central location in the knee, it is little affected by axial rotation and gives an indirect measure of sagittal plane kinematics. The tendon rotates posteriorly during flexion, moving steadily backwards about its insertion into the tibial tubercle. The effect is predicted by the sagittal plane model of the knee during passive motion (Fig. 3.14), and by the model of passive motion of the replaced knee (Fig. 3.17). The changes in PTA with flexion arise in part due to the cam-like shape of the distal femur, with the trochlea placed anterior to the flexion axis near extension (Fig. 3.14(a)), and the closer approach of the patella to the flexion axis in deeper flexion (Fig. 3.14(c)). The PTA changes are further increased by femoral roll-back during flexion.

It was shown in cadaver studies (Miller et al., 1998) that the normal pattern of PTA was restored throughout the range of flexion after medial OUKA with both cruciates preserved. After TKA with an unconstrained fixed-bearing prosthesis (implanted after division of the ACL), anterior subluxation of the femur caused an increase in the PTA in high flexion, i.e. loss of the normal rollback. When a posterior stabilised TKA was implanted after division of both cruciates, the PTA became normal in flexion as the cam of the prosthesis artificially restored natural rollback.

Price et al. (2004) used dynamic fluoroscopy to measure the PTA in the knees of five patients at 1 year after OUKA and five patients at 10 years during a step-up exercise. The measurements were compared with the knees of five patients who had undergone TKA and five normal volunteers (Fig. 3.27). The graphs show no significant difference in the pattern of tendon rotation between the control knees and those with OUKA. In contrast, the sagittal plane mechanics after TKA were significantly disturbed.

Figure 3.27 Patellar tendon angle recorded during a step-up exercise and plotted against flexion angle for groups of 5 normal volunteers, 5 patients one year and 5 patients 10 years after medial OUKA, and 5 patients one year after PCL-retaining TKA 60. (Reproduced with permission from Price AJ, Rees JL, Beard DJ, Gill RH, Dodd CA, Murray DM. Sagittal plane kinematics of a mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty at 10 years: a comparative in vivo fluoroscopic analysis. J Arthroplasty 2004; 19(5): 590-7.)

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Bearing movement in activity
  • Isometric quadriceps contractions
  • Passive anteroposterior laxity of the knee
  • The loaded human knee
  • The unloaded prosthetic knee
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs