• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • Appendix: Mathematical models of the knee
    • Three-dimensional model of knee mobility
    • Two-dimensional model of the knee: the four-bar linkage
      • Ligament kinematics
      • Stability of the loaded joint
    • Mathematical model of OUKA
      • Ligament mechanics
    • The patellofemoral joint
    • Conclusion
    • References

Conclusion

58 views 0

Experimental and mathematical studies of the mobility and stability of the normal knee show that each requires interaction between the articular surfaces and the ligaments.

The joint achieves its mobility because the surfaces can roll and slide on each other while the ligaments rotate about their origins and insertions on the bones. The articular surfaces keep some fibres of the ligaments just tight over the range of movement, while the ligaments keep the surfaces just in contact. These interactions require no tissue deformation and give the joint its range of unresisted motion, leading to the coupling of axial rotation to flexion angle and to femoral rollback.

The joint achieves its stability because the articular surfaces resist indentation under compressive forces and the ligaments resist elongation under tensile forces. As load increases, the indentations and elongations continue and the contact areas adjust until the ligament forces balance the applied loads and muscle forces. This mechanism gives the joint its characteristic laxity, requiring rapidly increasing applied loads to move the bones from their passive positions.

In activity, motion occurs under load and the mechanisms which control mobility and stability are combined.

All these features of natural mobility and stability can be restored to a satisfactory extent by retaining all ligaments and implanting fully unconstrained prosthetic components which allow but do not resist the movements required by the soft tissues. Polyethylene wear can be minimised by the use of fully conforming mobile meniscal bearings. Exact reproduction of the shapes of the natural articular surfaces is not required. The balance between restoration of function and resistance to wear is achieved by the use of spherical and flat articular surfaces on the metal components with an interposed fully conforming meniscal bearing to give a ligament compatible arthroplasty.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • The patellofemoral joint
  • Ligament mechanics
  • Mathematical model of OUKA
  • Stability of the loaded joint
  • Ligament kinematics
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs