• 01865 307 528
  • 07889 443721
  • christine@oxfordorthopaedics.net
  • Manor Hospital, Headington, Oxford, OX3 7RP
  • Home
  • Reference Book
      • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
      • Preface
      • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
      • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
      • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
      • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
      • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
      • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
      • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
      • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
      • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
      • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
      • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
      • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David_MurrayDavid Murray
    • Chris-Dodd2Christopher Dodd
    • John-O’ConnorJohn O’Connor
    • John GoodfellowJohn Goodfellow
    • Oxford-Knee-Fellows23Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
  • Home
  • Reference Book
    • Unicompartmental Arthroplasty with the Oxford Knee
    • Preface
    • Chapter 1: Introduction and Historical Overview
    • Chapter 2: Design and Biomechanics of the Oxford Knee
    • Chapter 3: Mobility and Stability of the Intact and Replaced Knee
    • Chapter 4; Indications: Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 5: Contraindications in Anteromedial Osteoarthritis
    • Chapter 6: Principles of the Oxford Operation
    • Chapter 7: Surgical technique: Cemented or cementless implantation with Microplasty instrumentation
    • Chapter 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Chapter 9: Postoperative Management and Radiography
    • Chapter 10: Clinical Results
    • Chapter 11: Management of Complications
    • Chapter 12: The Lateral Side
    • Appendix
  • Publications
  • Patient’s Area
  • Meet the Team
    • David Murray
    • Christopher Dodd
    • John O’Connor
    • John Goodfellow
    • Knee Fellows & Engineers
  • Contact
Expand All Collapse All
  • 8: Medial Indications other than AMOA
    • Focal spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK)
    • ACL deficiency
    • Failed upper tibial osteotomy
    • Post-traumatic osteoarthritis
    • Bicompartmental replacement
    • Inflammatory arthritis
    • References

Inflammatory arthritis

26 views 0

OUKA is contraindicated in the inflammatory forms of arthritis because they are diseases of the synovium and therefore cannot be limited to one compartment. Therefore, if an OUKA is implanted, progression of the disease to the other compartments is likely to occur. However, the loss of cartilage in early rheumatoid arthritis can be unicompartmental and has been mistaken for anteromedial OA and treated by OUKA (Kumar & Fiddian, 1999). The clinician needs to be aware of this pitfall because it results in early failure due to involvement of the other compartments of the knee.

With the widespread use of disease modifying drugs in inflammatory arthritis, the role of OUKA may change. It may be that it will be appropriate to use an OUKA in a patient with well controlled inflammatory arthritis. However, until there is evidence to support this, we do not recommend it.

Next >>

Was this helpful?

Yes  No
Related Articles
  • References
  • Bicompartmental replacement
  • Post-traumatic osteoarthritis
  • Failed upper tibial osteotomy
  • ACL deficiency
  • Focal spontaneous osteonecrosis of the knee (SONK)
The Oxford Knee Replacement is the most widely used partial knee replacement worldwide. Replacing one side of the knee, unicompartmental knee replacement, tends to result in shorter hospital stays, fewer short-term complications, faster recovery and better knee function than total knee replacements.

© All rights reserved Oxford Knee Info 2025

.

Privacy Policy

Popular Search:ACL damage, physical signs